1973 Honda 145 vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1973 Honda 145 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Jaguar E Type (226 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1973 Honda 145. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Jaguar E Type should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 480 kg more than 1973 Honda 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Honda 145 | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Honda | Jaguar |
| Model | 145 | E Type |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1433 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |
