1973 Honda 145 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 145 would be higher. At 1,433 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Honda 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1973 Honda 145. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 1973 Honda 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Honda 145 (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1973 Honda 145 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Honda 145 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Honda | Renault |
Model | 145 | Clio |
Year Released | 1973 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1433 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2480 mm |