1973 Honda 145 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 145 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1973 Honda 145. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 145.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 145. (118 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 145.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Honda 145 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Honda | Holden |
Model | 145 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1433 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |