1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7

To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (109 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.

Because 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer has manual transmission. 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: