1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 248 more horse power than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Because 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (270 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Grand Wagoneer | UTE |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |