1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey. (120 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey.
Because 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Jensen Jensen-Healey | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Jensen | Volvo |
| Model | Jensen-Healey | C70 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
