1973 Lancia 2000 vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Lancia 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Lancia 2000 would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1973 Lancia 2000. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Lancia 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 151 kg more than 1973 Lancia 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Lancia 2000. (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Lancia 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Lancia 2000 | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | 2000 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2262 cc |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |
