1973 Lancia Beta vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1973 Lancia Beta is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Lancia Beta (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 532 kg more than 1973 Lancia Beta.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Lancia Beta | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Lancia | Volvo |
| Model | Beta | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 1756 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2850 mm |
