1973 Lancia Beta vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1973 Lancia Beta. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1973 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 461 kg more than 1973 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Lancia Beta | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Beta | C30 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 60 L |