1973 Matra-Simca M530 vs. 2009 Mazda 6

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Matra-Simca M530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1973 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Matra-Simca M530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1973 Matra-Simca M530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Matra-Simca M530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Matra-Simca M530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Matra-Simca M530.

Compare all specifications: