1973 Matra-Simca M670 vs. 1996 Volvo S40
To start off, 1996 Volvo S40 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 (445 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1996 Volvo S40. (138 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo S40 weights approximately 538 kg more than 1973 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Matra-Simca M670 | 1996 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Volvo |
| Model | M670 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 445 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 11000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1218 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2560 mm |
