1973 Matra-Simca M670 vs. 2005 Volvo S60

To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 (445 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 2005 Volvo S60. (179 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 889 kg more than 1973 Matra-Simca M670.

Because 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1973 Matra-Simca M670 has manual transmission. 1973 Matra-Simca M670 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: