1973 Matra-Simca M670 vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 (445 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 449 kg more than 1973 Matra-Simca M670.

Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1973 Matra-Simca M670 has manual transmission. 1973 Matra-Simca M670 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: