1973 Matra-Simca M670 vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 (445 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C30. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C30.
Because 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo C30 has automatic transmission and 1973 Matra-Simca M670 has manual transmission. 1973 Matra-Simca M670 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo C30 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Matra-Simca M670 | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Volvo |
Model | M670 | C30 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 445 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 11000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2650 mm |