1973 Mazda 110 S vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 4,343 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (120 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 526 kg more than 1973 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (305 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm). This means 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda 110 S | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 110 S | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 4343 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1486 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2750 mm |
