1973 Mazda 110 S vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 444 kg more than 1973 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass (249 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda 110 S | 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 110 S | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 3135 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 249 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1404 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2720 mm |