1973 Mazda 110 S vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2006 Rover 25 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2006 Rover 25. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 25 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 25 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda 110 S | 2006 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 110 S | 25 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1994 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2510 mm |
