1973 Mazda 110 S vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 409 kg more than 1973 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda 110 S | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 110 S | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 2399 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1369 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2860 mm |
