1973 Mazda 110 S vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1006 kg more than 1973 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda 110 S | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 110 S | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 3700 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2875 mm |