1973 Mazda 110 S vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (217 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 961 kg more than 1973 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (440 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda 110 S | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 110 S | XC60 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2748 mm |