1973 Mazda 616 vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1973 Mazda 616 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Volvo 120 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 120 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1973 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 120 (145 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda 616 | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 616 | 120 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |