1973 Mazda 616 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (312 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 805 kg more than 1973 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda 616 | 2011 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 616 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 312 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2852 mm |