1973 Mazda 818 vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Mazda 818 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda 818 (68 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda 818 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda 818 (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda 818 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: