1973 Mazda 929 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1973 Mazda 929 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda 929 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda 929 (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda 929 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | 929 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 25 L |