1973 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 Acura RSX
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 62 kg more than 1973 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 929. (137 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda 929 | 2002 Acura RSX | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | 929 | RSX |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |