1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1960 Wartburg 311
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1960 Wartburg 311. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1960 Wartburg 311.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Wartburg 311, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Wartburg 311. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 1960 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Mazda | Wartburg |
Model | RX-2 | 311 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2460 mm |