1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-2 | 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | RX-2 | Park Avenue |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3300 mm |
