1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1975 Volvo 66 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1975 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-2 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | RX-2 | 66 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
