1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 1990 Toyota Model F
To start off, 1990 Toyota Model F is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1990 Toyota Model F. (76 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1990 Toyota Model F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Toyota Model F weights approximately 340 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 1990 Toyota Model F | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-2 | Model F |
Year Released | 1973 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2240 mm |