1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2000 Renault P55
To start off, 2000 Renault P55 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Renault P55. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Renault P55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault P55 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault P55, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Renault P55 (260 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Renault P55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2000 Renault P55 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | RX-2 | P55 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 900 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1770 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |
