1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 650 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-2 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 622 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2440 mm |
