1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 15 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | RX-2 | Smart |
Year Released | 1973 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |