1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2005 Scion xA
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Scion xA. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Scion xA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Scion xA weights approximately 101 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Scion xA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xA. (142 Nm). This means 1973 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xA.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2005 Scion xA | |
Make | Mazda | Scion |
Model | RX-2 | xA |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1061 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2380 mm |