1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 675 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | RX-2 | BLS |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2680 mm |