1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Citroen C5

To start off, 2010 Citroen C5 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C5. (106 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C5 weights approximately 567 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2.

Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C5 (250 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Mazda RX-2 2010 Citroen C5
Make Mazda Citroen
Model RX-2 C5
Year Released 1973 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2292 cc 1996 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 118 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 157 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 960 kg 1527 kg
Vehicle Length 4160 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1590 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2760 mm