1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (292 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1392 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (433 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | RX-2 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 433 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2352 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3670 mm |