1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-2 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2601 mm |