1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (154 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | RX-2 | 508 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1853 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2817 mm |