1973 Mazda RX-2 vs. 2012 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2012 Renault Koleos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Koleos weights approximately 690 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-2 | 2012 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-2 | Koleos |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1855 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2690 mm |