1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 804 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-3 | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | RX-3 | Baby |
Year Released | 1973 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3130 mm |