1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1978 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1978 Nissan Cedric is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 498 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Nissan Cedric (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1978 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-3 | 1978 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-3 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1973 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2700 mm |