1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-3 | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | RX-3 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4690 mm |
