1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (200 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-3 | 1998 Acura TL | |
| Make | Mazda | Acura |
| Model | RX-3 | TL |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2840 mm |
