1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 7,410 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (612 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 512 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1198 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (848 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 713 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-3 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | RX-3 | E |
Year Released | 1973 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 7410 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 612 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 848 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 75 L |