1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 107 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-3 | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Mazda | ZAZ |
| Model | RX-3 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2330 mm |
