1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2005 Tata Mint
To start off, 2005 Tata Mint is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2005 Tata Mint. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Tata Mint.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Tata Mint, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Tata Mint. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Tata Mint.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-3 | 2005 Tata Mint | |
| Make | Mazda | Tata |
| Model | RX-3 | Mint |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 852 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2410 mm |
