1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Mazda RX-3 | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-3 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |
