1973 Mazda RX-3 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (118 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Jazz (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-3 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | RX-3 | Jazz |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 42 L |