1973 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (114 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1973 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-4 | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-4 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2610 mm |