1973 Mazda RX-4 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1973 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Mazda RX-4 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | RX-4 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2616 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2685 mm |